The following article is reprinted from the August, 1996 issue
of On the Edge, the Interactive Data Fixed Income Analytics bimonthly newsletter.
Option Value and Zero Volatility Spreads
Teri Geske
Senior Vice President, Product Development
In a previous newsletter article we
briefly summarized four measures of risk which allow the fixed income investor to evaluate
a portfolio's sensitivity to risk factors other than changes in interest rates. One of
those measures, the Zero Volatility (ZVO) spread, was described as the spread an investor
would expect to earn if there was no uncertainty about the future path of interest rates.
We pointed out that the difference between the Zero Volatility spread and the Option
Adjusted Spread may be thought of as the time value of the prepayment option, since the
OAS incorporates fluctuations in prepayments along various interest rate paths into the
future when volatility is present. These concepts of volatility and time value apply to
all options and can be useful in understanding the effective duration, and therefore price
behavior, of different security types with various embedded options, including prepayment
options and caps.
Options are said to have both intrinsic and time value, where the intrinsic value is
the amount the option holder would realize if the option were exercised today. In many
cases, the intrinsic value is zero. A simple example of this is a currently callable
corporate bond priced below its call price. The intrinsic value of the call is zero, but
there is some value to the option as long as one assumes interest rates can deviate from
current levels into the future. We can also say that the longer the time to the expiration
date, the more time value there is in the option (given a particular term structure of
volatility) because there is more opportunity for the option to end up in the money prior
to the expiration date.
In this example, although the bond's price of $101.938 is below its call price of
$102.760, the call option has a time value of $5.39. When we extend the bond's maturity
date (and thus the expiration date of the option) by five years, the option value
increases to $9.557.
Prepayment Options
The prepayment option in a mortgage may be thought of as a combination of a call option
and a put option, since homeowners have the right to accelerate prepayments, or call their
mortgages away from investors when rates fall, and can reduce (or even stop) prepayments
when rates rise, thereby forcing the investor to hold an asset whose value has declined.
(Unfortunately, since homeowners do not necessarily exercise these options in an
economically optimal way they are difficult to value; this issue is addressed in the
Prepayment Uncertainty measure we discussed in last month's newsletter).
Both the call and put options embedded in a mortgage-backed security have time value as
long as we assume some degree of volatility going forward. That time value will change in
response to movements in interest rates (and to changes in volatility estimates, which is
described by another risk measure, Vega). As rates fall, the time value of the call option
increases, limiting the price increase that a falling rate environment would otherwise
produce. As rates increase, the time value of the call option decreases, which cushions
the price decline caused by the increase in yield levels. However, just as the value of
the call declines when rates rise, the time value of the homeowner's put option increases,
somewhat offsetting the benefit derived from the decline in the value of the call.
Depending upon the type of collateral, the impact of the change in either the call value
or put value will dominate. Both options are reflected in the OAS, which is compared to
the ZVO to measure the total time value of the prepayment option. If we were to set
volatility to zero, the ZVO and the OAS would be the same.
CMOs are similarly affected, with the added complexity of the deal structure. VADM
tranches and PACs with short average lives are not particularly sensitive to changes in
the time value of the prepayment option because their cashflows are stable. We would
therefore expect there to be little difference between the Zero Volatility Spread and the
OAS for these instruments, since interest rate volatility in the future will have little
impact on the pattern of cashflows received by the investor.
Interest Rate Caps
The price of a CMO floater with a lifetime cap may be greatly affected by changes in
the time value of the option the cap represents. As rates rise, even if the coupon has not
yet reached the lifetime cap rate the time value of the cap which the investor has shorted
increases, because there is a higher probability that over the remaining life of the bond
the coupon formula will exceed the cap rate. This can cause the effective duration of a
CMO floater to lengthen considerably in a rising rate environment.
The time value of a cap is also impacted by the slope of the yield curve. For CMO
floaters with long average lives, and for Adjustable Rate Mortgages, a positively sloped
yield curve implies that a short term index, such as 1 month LIBOR or the 1 Year CMT, will
rise into the future. If the curve steepens, the likelihood that a coupon based on one of
these rates will ultimately encounter its lifetime cap increases, thereby increasing the
time value of the embedded option. Even though an ARM's coupon may be at or near its fully
indexed value and below its lifetime cap, the ARM's effective duration can be
substantially greater than the time to the next reset date, indicating that there is much
time value left in the embedded lifetime cap. The difference between the ARM's Zero
Volatility Spread and its OAS measures that value.
We believe the Zero Volatility spread and the other measures, Vega, Prepayment
Uncertainty and Spread Duration, offer important information for understanding the various
risks inherent in a diversified fixed income portfolio. We will continue to discuss these
risk measures in upcoming articles and welcome your feedback on this and other topics of
interest.